Introduction

In this chapter I return to the topic of the four (noble) truths, broached in the last chapter but one on the Saccavibhaṅga-sutta. With the present chapter I instead turn to the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta. In another study dedicated to the same discourse, I examined parallels to this discourse from the Sarvāstivāda and Mūlasarvāstivāda traditions.[n.1] Anālayo 2012a, reprinted in Anālayo 2015i. In the present study I cover the remaining parallels found in Āgama and Vinaya literature that has been preserved in Chinese translation.

Among these remaining parallels are two versions of the Discourse on Turning the Wheel of Dharma found in the Ekottarika-āgama. The first of these two versions occurs as a discourse on its own among the Twos of the Ekottarika-āgama.[n.2] [3] EĀ 19.2 at T II 593b24 to 593c10. The second Ekottarika-āgama version is part of a longer discourse that reports the events after the Buddhaʼs awakening, found among the Threes.[n.3] [4] EĀ 24.5 at T II 619a8 to 619b19; for a French translation of the relevant section of EĀ 24.5 cf. Bareau 1988: 81f.

Another version of the Discourse on Turning the Wheel of Dharma can be found in the Mahīśāsaka Vinaya, preserved in Chinese translation, as part of a biography of the Buddha.[n.4] [6] T 1421 at T XXII 104b23 to 105a2; translated into French by Bareau 1963: 174f.

Similar to the Mahīśāsaka Vinaya, the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya also has a version of the present discourse embedded in its biography of the Buddha, extant in Chinese.[n.5] [7] T 1428 at T XXII 788a6 to 788c7; translated into French by Bareau 1963: 175– 177.

I begin by translating the two discourses from the Ekottarika-āgama.[n.6] [8&10] The translated discourses are EĀ 19.2 at T II 593b24 to 593c10 and EĀ 24.5 at T II 619a8 to 619b19, the second being an extract from a longer discourse.

---

Translation (1), The First Ekottarika-āgama Discourse

Thus have I heard. At one time the Buddha was at Vārāṇasī in the Deer Park, the [Dwelling of] Seers.

Then the Blessed One said to the monks:[n.7] [9] EĀ 19.2 gives no explicit indication that these are the five monks. The corresponding parts in the Vinaya versions translated below also do not explicitly mention the five monks, even though the context makes it clear that they form the audience of the discourse. This makes it probable that the same applies to EĀ 19.2, in that the lack of an explicit reference to the five monks may well be a sign that this discourse is an extract from a longer account. The tale of how the five left the bodhisattva when he gave up his ascetic practices is recorded in EĀ 31.8 at T II 671c5, so that the reciters of the Ekottarika-āgama were aware of the situation that, according to the traditional account, formed the background to the Buddha's exposition on the two extremes. "There are these two things that one training in the path ought not to become involved with. What are the two things? That is, they are the state of being attached to sensual pleasures and their enjoyment, which is lowly and the state of the commoner, and the assemblage of these [self-inflicted] pains with their manifold vexations. These are reckoned the two things that one training in the path ought not to become involved with.

"Having left behind these two things in this way, I have myself reached the essential path that leads to the attainment of full awakening, to the arising of vision, to the arising of knowledge, [whereby] the mind attains appeasement, attains the penetrative knowledges, accomplishes the fruits of recluseship, and reaches Nirvāṇa.

"What is the essential path that leads to attainment of full awakening, that arouses vision, arouses knowledge, [whereby] the mind attains appeasement, attains the penetrative knowledges, accomplishes the fruits of recluseship, and reaches Nirvāṇa? That is, it is this noble eightfold path, namely right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration. This is reckoned to be the essential path that I have reached.

"I have now attained right awakening, arousing vision, arousing knowledge, the mind attaining appeasement, attaining the penetrative knowledges, accomplishing the fruits of recluseship, and reaching Nirvāṇa. Monks, you should train in this way, abandon the above [mentioned] two things and cultivate this essential path. Monks, you should train in this way."

Then the monks, having heard what the Buddha had said, were delighted and received it respectfully.

---

Translation (2), The Second Ekottarika-āgama Discourse

At that time the Blessed One said to the five monks: "You should know that there are these four truths. What are the four? They are the truth of dukkha, the truth of the arising of dukkha, the truth of the cessation of dukkha, and the truth of the path leading out of dukkha.

"What is reckoned to be the truth of dukkha? That is, birth is dukkha, old age is dukkha, disease is dukkha, death is dukkha, [as well as] grief, vexation, affliction, worry, and pains that cannot be measured; association with what is disliked is dukkha, dissociation from what is liked is dukkha, not getting what one wishes is also dukkha; stated in brief, the five aggregates of clinging are dukkha. This is reckoned to be the truth of dukkha.

"What is the truth of the arising of dukkha? That is, it is grasping conjoined with craving that leads to acting carelessly with a mind that keeps being lustfully attached. This is reckoned to be the truth of the arising of dukkha.

"What is the truth of the cessation of dukkha?[n.8] EĀ 24.5 at T II 619a15+17 precedes this and the next question with 彼, which I have not translated, on the assumption that this is a textual error. It is being able to bring about the eradication and cessation without remainder of that craving, so that it will not arise again. This is reckoned to be the truth of the cessation of dukkha.

"What is reckoned to be the truth of the path leading out of dukkha? That is, it is the noble eightfold path, namely right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration. This is reckoned to be the teaching of the four truths.

"Again, five monks, with this teaching of the four truths, in regard to things not heard before, vision arose [in me] about the truth of dukkha, knowledge arose, understanding arose, awakening arose, clarity arose, and wisdom arose. Again, the truth of dukkha is real, it is certain, it is not vain, it is not false, it is certainly not otherwise than as it has been declared by the Blessed One, therefore it is reckoned to be the truth of dukkha.

"In regard to things not heard before, vision arose [in me] about the truth of the arising of dukkha, knowledge arose, understanding arose, awakening arose, clarity arose, and wisdom arose. Again, the truth of the arising of dukkha is real, it is certain, it is not vain, it is not false, it is certainly not otherwise than as it has been declared by the Blessed One, therefore it is reckoned to be the truth of the arising of dukkha.

"In regard to things not heard before, vision arose [in me] about the truth of the cessation of dukkha, knowledge arose, understanding arose, awakening arose, wisdom arose, and clarity arose. Again, the truth of the cessation of dukkha is real, it is certain, it is not vain, it is not false, it is certainly not otherwise than as it has been declared by the Blessed One, therefore it is reckoned to be the truth of the cessation of dukkha.

"In regard to things not heard before, vision arose [in me] about the truth of the path leading out of dukkha, knowledge arose, understanding arose, awakening arose, clarity arose, and wisdom arose. Again, the truth of the path leading out of dukkha is real, it is certain, it is not vain, it is not false, it is certainly not otherwise than as it has been declared by the Blessed One, therefore it is reckoned to be the truth of the path leading out of dukkha.

"Five monks, you should know, those who do not understand as they really are these four truths in three turnings and twelve modes do not accomplish the supreme ⟨arrival⟩ at truth,[n.9] My translation is based on emending 正 to read 至, in line with the formulation used right away in the next sentence. which is perfect and right awakening. Because I discerned these four truths in three turnings and twelve modes, understanding them as they really are, therefore I accomplished the supreme arrival at truth, which is perfect and right awakening."

At the time when this teaching was being spoken, Aññāta Koṇḍañña attained the pure eye of Dharma, eliminating all [mental] dust and stain. Then the Blessed One said to Koṇḍañña: "Have you now reached the Dharma, have you attained the Dharma?" Koṇḍañña replied: "So it is, Blessed One, I have attained the Dharma, I have reached the Dharma."

Then the spirits of the earth, having heard these words, made the proclamation: "Now at Vārāṇasī the Tathāgata has turned the wheel of Dharma that devas and men, Māra and Māra's [retinue of] devas, humans and non-humans are unable to turn. Today the Tathāgata has turned this wheel of Dharma. Aññāta Koṇḍañña has attained the ambrosial Dharma."

Then the Four Heavenly Kings heard the proclamation made by the spirits of the earth and in turn proclaimed: "… Aññāta Koṇḍañña has attained the ambrosial Dharma."

Then the devas of the Thirty-three heard it from the Four Heavenly Kings, the Yāma devas heard it from the devas of the Thirty-three … up to … the Tuṣita devas in turn heard the proclamation … up to … the Brahmā devas also heard the proclamation: "At Vārāṇasī the Tathāgata has turned the wheel of Dharma that has not been turned by devas and men,[n.10] [11] The present passage no longer mentions an inability to turn the wheel of Dharma. Māra and Māraʼs [retinue of] devas, humans and non-humans. Today the Tathāgata has turned this wheel of Dharma." Then [Koṇḍañña] came to be called Aññāta Koṇḍañña.

---

Study (1)

The first of the above two discourses from the Ekottarika-āgama reports only the rejection of the two extremes, similar in this respect to the Madhyama-āgama parallel to the Ariyapariyesanā-sutta.[n.11] [12] MĀ 204 at T I 777c25 to 778a2; cf. also Anālayo 2012a: 27f. EĀ 19.2 is located among the Twos of the Ekottarika-āgama collection, which is in keeping with the main topic of this discourse being the rejection of the two extremes. These two discourses, the first of the two Ekottarika-āgama versions and the Madhyama-āgama parallel to the Ariyapariyesanā-sutta, have been interpreted by Bareau as evidence that some reciters were not aware of the four noble truths as the theme of the Buddha's first discourse, or even refused to consider it as such.[n.12] [13] According to Bareau 1963: 181, MĀ 204 and EĀ 19.2 "nous montre[nt] qu'à une lointaine époque, une partie au moins de docteurs du Bouddhisme ignoraient quel avait été le thème du premier sermon ou refusaient de considérer comme tel les quatre saintes Vérités."

In both cases his hypothesis is flawed by the methodological problem that Bareau did not consider all relevant versions. In the present case his discussion does not take into account the second Ekottarika-āgama discourse translated above.[n.13] [14] Schmithausen 1981: 202 note 11 already pointed out that EĀ 24.5 has the portions of the first discourse that are not found in EĀ 19.2. Given that this second version is part of the same discourse collection and does have an exposition of the four truths, it becomes obvious that the reciters of the Ekottarika-āgama were aware of the four truths as the theme of the Buddha's first discourse and did not refuse to consider it as such. Therefore the first Ekottarika-āgama discourse is probably best understood as an extract from a longer account of the events surrounding the delivery of the Buddha's first teaching.[n.14] [15] This would in fact be in line with an observation made by Bareau 1963: 9 himself that such short discourses appear to be extracts from longer accounts: "les petits Sūtra contenus dans le Samyuktāgama, Samyuttanikāya, Ekottarāgama et Aṅguttaranikāya … ces Sūtra courts apparaissent bien plutôt comme des extraits commodes tirés des textes plus longs." This observation provides a considerably more convincing explanation of the situation than the hypothesis that the teaching expressed in the form of the four noble truths is late.

Besides confirming that Bareau's hypothesis is in need of revision,[n.15] [16] Zafiropulo 1993: 111 even goes so far as to consider it paradoxical to doubt the relationship of the noble truths to the Buddha's awakening: "l'association des Āryasatyāni à l'événement de la Saṃbodhi du Maître est tellement bien attestée, qu'il semblerait quasi paradoxal (au sens étymologique du mot) de vouloir essayer de la minimiser ou de la mettre en doute." the fact that the second Ekottarika-āgama version refers to the four truths is of further significance in that the truths are not described as "noble". This qualification is used in the Ekottarika-āgama discourse only for the eightfold path, not for any of the truths. As discussed above in the chapter on the Saccavibhaṅga-sutta, the absence of the qualification "noble" in relation to the four truths gives the impression that at an early stage the qualification "noble" was not used invariably when the four truths were mentioned.

Norman (1984: 386f) suggests that in several contexts even the entire expression ariyasacca was added later. He considers such an addition of the expression ariyasacca to have been inspired by occurrences of the expression ariyasacca in short statements found elsewhere. One example he gives for such short statements is a reference to teaching "the four noble truths … dukkha, its arising, the path, and its cessation".[n.16] [20] Th 492: cattāri ariyasaccāni … dukkhaṃ samudayo maggo nirodho, on which Norman 1984: 390 note 8 comments that "the order of the last two items is reversed for metrical reasons"; on similar reversals in the order of referring to the third and fourth truth cf. Anālayo 2011g: 26f. Another example given by him is a succinct statement of the type "the four noble truths: the noble truth of dukkha, the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, and the noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha".[n.17] [21] DN 34 at DN III 277,8: cattāri ariyasaccāni: dukkhaṃ ariyasaccaṃ, dukkhasamudayaṃ (Ce and Se: dukkhasamudayo) ariyasaccaṃ, dukkhanirodhaṃ (Ce and Se: dukkhanirodho) ariyasaccaṃ, dukkhanirodhagāminī patipadā (Be, Ce, and Se: paṭipadā) ariyasaccaṃ. Norman 1984: 379f mentions Th 492 and the passage from DN 34 as examples for what he refers to as the "'mnemonic' set", on which Norman 1984: 387 then comments that "the word ariya-sacca … its presence in the 'mnemonic' set doubtless led to its introduction there [i.e. in passages such as SN 56.11] by analogy." The occurrence of the expression "noble truth" in such a short statement would then have led to the same expression being used also in other passages, where it was not originally found.

Norman's reconstruction does not mean that the teaching on the four truths as such is a late addition to the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta,[n.18] [22] After a detailed survey of Norman's discussion, Anderson 1999/2001: 20 comes to the unexpected conclusion that "Norman's evidence, however, demonstrates that the four noble truths were not part of the earliest form of the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta." and it certainly does not imply that early Buddhist thought did not have a notion of truth as such.[n.19] [23] This has been suggested by Batchelor 2012: 92f, who reasons that "one implication of Norman's discovery is that the Buddha may not have been concerned with questions of 'truth' at all … if Mr. Norman is correct, the Buddha may not have presented his ideas in terms of 'truth' at all." Norman's discussion means only that an early version of the first teaching given by the Buddha in the form of the four truths did not employ the expression ariyasacca to designate each of these four singly when explaining their implications.

Such additions of the expression ariyasacca, taken from one context and added to other passages, would be a natural occurrence for material that was orally transmitted over long periods. Oral tradition tends to stereotype, thereby facilitating memorization, with at times little sensitivity to the individual context.[n.20] [24] As von Hinüber 1996/1997: 31 explains, "pieces of texts known by heart may intrude into almost any context once there is a corresponding key word." It would therefore not be surprising if the expression ariyasacca or the qualification "noble" was originally found in some contexts only, but during oral transmission came to be applied to other passages.

The influence of the tendency to stereotype is also relevant for the remainder of the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta and its parallels. As Gombrich (2009: 103f) points out, the "first sermon" that has come down to us is chock full of metaphors and technical terms which the Buddha at that stage had not yet explained … the disciples who made up the original audience could have had no idea what the Buddha was talking about when he used these terms.[n.21] [25] Cf. also Rewata Dhamma 1997: 40.

Just as with the four truths, this does not mean that the teachings expressed by these technical terms, such as, for example, "the five aggregates of clinging", were not given at all and should be considered later additions in themselves. It means only that the texts we have are not verbatim records of what the Buddha said, but rather are the final products of a prolonged oral transmission.

I continue with a translation of the Mahīśāsaka Vinaya version.[n.22] [26] The translated part is taken from T 1421 at T XXII 104b23 to 105a2.

---

Translation (3), The Mahīśāsaka Vinaya

The Buddha further said [to the five monks]:[n.23] [27] The five (monks) are explicitly referred to in the preceding phrase, T 1421 at T XXII 104b23: 五人. "In the world there are two extremes that one should not become involved with. The first is lustful attachment to craving for sensual pleasures, proclaiming that there is no fault in sensual pleasures. The second is the wrong view of tormenting the body, which has not a trace of the [right] path.

"Abandon these two extremes and in turn obtain the middle path that gives rise to vision, knowledge, understanding, and awakening, and that leads to Nirvāṇa! What is reckoned to be the middle path? That is, it is the eight[fold] right [path] of right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration. This is the middle path.

"Again, there are four noble truths, which are the noble truth of dukkha, the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, and the noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha.

"What is the noble truth of dukkha? That is, birth is dukkha, old age is dukkha, disease is dukkha, death is dukkha, sadness and vexation are dukkha, association with what is disliked is dukkha, dissociation from what is liked is dukkha, loss of what one wishes for is dukkha, in short, the five aggregates of clinging are dukkha. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of dukkha.

"What is reckoned to be the noble truth of the arising of dukkha? That is, it is craving for existence,[n.24] [28] T 1421 at T XXII 104c3: 有愛. As already noted by Choong 2000: 166, Delhey 2009: 69 note 4, and Anālayo 2011c: 70 note 216, the three types of craving regularly listed in such contexts in the Pāli canon – craving for sensual pleasures, for existence, and for annihilation – are only rarely mentioned in parallel versions; cf. also Anālayo 2016f. which comes together with the arising of defilements, delighting with attachment in this and that. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the arising of dukkha.

"What is reckoned to be the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha? That is, it is the eradication of craving, its cessation and extinction without remainder, Nirvāṇa. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha.

"What is reckoned to be the noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha? That is, it is the eight[fold] right path. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha.

"Regarding this Dharma, which I had not heard before, vision arose, knowledge arose, understanding arose, awakening arose, insight arose, and wisdom arose. Regarding this Dharma, which I had not heard before and which should be understood, vision arose … up to … wisdom arose. Regarding this Dharma, which I had not heard before and which has been understood, vision arose … up to … wisdom arose.

"Regarding this noble truth of dukkha … regarding this noble truth of dukkha which should be understood … regarding this noble truth of dukkha which I had not heard before and which has been understood, vision arose … up to … wisdom arose.

"Regarding this noble truth of the arising of dukkha … regarding this noble truth of the arising of dukkha which should be eradicated … regarding this noble truth of the arising of dukkha which I had not heard before and which has been eradicated, vision arose … up to … wisdom arose.

"Regarding this noble truth of the cessation of dukkha … regarding this noble truth of the cessation of dukkha which should be realized … regarding this noble truth of the cessation of dukkha which I had not heard before and which has been realized, vision arose … up to … wisdom arose.

"Regarding this noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha … regarding this noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha which should be developed … regarding this noble truth of the path to the cessation of dukkha which I had not heard before and which has been developed, vision arose … up to … wisdom arose.

"Having understood as it really is this wheel of Dharma in three turnings and twelve modes, I attained supreme and full awakening."

When this teaching was delivered, the earth quaked six times and Koṇḍañña attained among all teachings the pure eye of Dharma that is remote from [mental] stains and free from [mental] dust. The Buddha asked him: "Koṇḍañña, have you understood? Koṇḍañña, have you understood?" Koṇḍañña replied: "Blessed One, I have understood."

On hearing this, the spirits of the earth told the spirits in the sky, the spirits in the sky told the devas of the Four Heavenly Kings, the devas of the Four Heavenly Kings told the devas of the Thirty-three, and so on in turn up to the Brahmā devas, saying: "Now at Vārāṇasī the Buddha has turned the supreme wheel of Dharma that has not been turned before, that recluses, brahmins, devas, Māra, Brahmā, and the whole world has not turned before."

All the devas were delighted and sent down a rain of various kinds of flowers. Everywhere there was a brilliant light as if stars had fallen to the ground and in mid air the [devas] performed divine music.

---

Study (2)

A noteworthy feature of the Mahīśāsaka Vinaya version is its description of a rain of flowers, a brilliant light, and divine music. The other canonical versions preserved in Chinese do not report such miraculous events. However, a description that is to some degree comparable occurs in the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta. According to the Pāli account, the turning of the wheel of Dharma resulted in earthquakes throughout the ten-thousand-fold world system and an immeasurably brilliant light appeared in the world and surpassed the majesty of the devas.[n.25] [29] SN 56.11 at SN V 424,4: ayañ ca dasasahassī (Be: dasasahassi) lokadhātu saṅkampi (Ee: saṃkampi) sampakampi sampavedhi, appamāṇo ca uḷāro (Se: oḷāro) obhāso loke pātur ahosi atikkamma (Se: atikkammeva) devānaṃ devānubhāvan ti. Earthquakes are also mentioned in several biographies of the Buddha preserved in Chinese translation; cf. T 189 at T III 644c20, T 190 at T III 812b20, and T 196 at T IV 149a10, often together with other miraculous occurrences such as a great light, divine music, or a rain of flowers.

The absence of any reference to earthquakes or else to celestial flowers and divine music in the canonical parallel versions makes it fairly safe to conclude that these are probably later developments.[n.26] [30] According to Przyluski 1918: 424, Waldschmidt 1944: 107, Frauwallner 1956: 158, and Bareau 1979: 79, listings of three causes for earthquakes found in some discourses appear to be earlier than listings of eight causes for earthquakes. This conclusion would be supported by the finding that earthquakes are not reported in the Chinese canonical parallels to SN 56.11, except for the Mahīśāsaka Vinaya version, as only the listings of eight causes mention the turning of the wheel of Dharma as an occasion for the earth to quake. For a study of earthquakes in Buddhist literature cf. Ciurtin 2009 and 2012. The same does not seem to be the case, however, for the acclamations of the turning of the wheel of Dharma in various celestial realms,[n.27] [31] Bareau 1963: 182 considers these descriptions to be late: "la mise en mouvement de la Roue de la Loi remue le monde des dieux de la terre à l'empyrée … ceci confirme l'hypothèse émise plus haut et selon laquelle le texte du premier sermon serait postérieur au récit primitif de l'Éveil." which are reported in all canonical versions.[n.28] [32] Celestial acclamations are not mentioned in T 191 at T III 954b2, which reports only that eighty thousand devas attained stream-entry.

Elsewhere the discourses collected in the Pāli Nikāyas and Chinese Āgamas abound with references to various devas. These discourses report that the Buddha and his disciples repeatedly went to the heavens for shorter or longer visits to discuss various topics with devas, or that they were visited by devas who wanted to ask a question or make some statement. In view of such passages there seems to be little ground for assuming that the celestial acclamations of the turning of the wheel of Dharma must in principle be later than the remainder of the discourse.[n.29] [33] In the context of a discussion of supernormal powers, Fiordalis 2010/2011: 403 comments that "scholars have been too quick to conclude … that Buddhism rejects the miraculous wholesale in favor of some sort of rational humanism that reflects modern predilections"; cf. also Anālayo 2015a and 2016e.

The picture that in this way emerges from a comparative study of the Chinese parallels to the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta seems to me to exemplify a general pattern. It is undeniable that supernormal occurrences, such as encounters with celestial beings and psychic abilities, are an integral part of the teachings of early Buddhism in the way these have been preserved in the texts. It would not do justice to the material at our disposal if we were to consider only the doctrinal teachings as authentic aspects of early Buddhism and summarily dismiss the miraculous aspects as later accretions.

However, this should not blind us to the fact that some miracles do appear to be the result of later developments.[n.30] Cf. in more detail Anālayo 2015a and 2016e. Just as the texts do not support a total dismissal of miraculous elements as invariably late, they equally clearly show that with the passage of time some of these elements become more prominent. Examples in the present case are the earthquakes, the rain of divine flowers, etc.

Besides the reference to earthquakes, another peculiarity of the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta in relation to the celestial repercussions of the turning of the wheel of Dharma is that the devas proclaim that this wheel cannot be turned back by anyone in the world.[n.31] [35] SN 56.11 at SN V 423,20: appativattiyaṃ (Be and Se: appaṭivattiyaṃ) samaṇena vā brāhmaṇena vā … kenaci vā lokasmin ti. Most of the Chinese parallel versions instead indicate that this wheel had not been turned by others or that others were unable to turn it.[n.32] [36] An exception is the Kṣudrakavastu version, which merely states that this turning of the wheel is of great benefit for others; cf. T 1451 at T XXIV 292c7 = T 110 at T II 504b14 and Anālayo 2012a: 40. The idea that others might try to interfere with the turning of the wheel is found only in the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta. This could be the result of an error in transmission, whereby an original reading "cannot be turned", appavattiyaṃ, became "cannot be turned back", appaṭivattiyaṃ.[n.33] [37] An original reading appavattiyaṃ would be in line with the reading apravartyaṃ found in the corresponding passage in the Saṅghabhedavastu, Gnoli 1977: 136,24 and in the Mahāvastu, Senart 1897: 334,15.

The last version to be translated stems from the Dharmaguptaka Vinaya.[n.34] [38] The translated part is taken from T 1428 at T XXII 788a6 to 788c7.

---

Translation (4), The Dharmaguptaka Vinaya

"[Five] monks,[n.35] [39] Although the present passage does not explicitly indicate that the five monks are meant, this is explicitly indicated a little earlier, T 1428 at T XXII 787c28: 佛告五人言. one gone forth should not be involved with the two extremes of delighting in and developing craving for sensual pleasures, or with the practice of self-[inflicted] suffering, which is an ignoble teaching that afflicts body and mind, and which does not enable one to accomplish what is to be done.

"Monks, having left these two extremes behind, there is in turn a middle path for vision and understanding, for knowledge and understanding, for perpetual quietude and appeasement, for accomplishing penetrative knowledge and attaining full awakening, for accomplishing [real] recluseship and proceeding [towards] Nirvāṇa.

"What is called the middle path for vision and understanding, for knowledge and understanding, for perpetual quietude and appeasement, for accomplishing penetrative knowledge and attaining full awakening, for accomplishing [real] recluseship and proceeding [towards] Nirvāṇa? It is this noble eight [fold] right path of right view, right thought,[n.36] [40] The listing of the path factors in T 1428 at T XXII 788a12 has as its second member 正業 and as its fourth 正行. On the assumption that the listing corresponds to the standard sequence of the path factors, I take 業, which usually renders just karman, in the alternative sense of abhisaṃskāra, listed by Hirakawa 1997: 660 as one of the possible equivalents for 業. In EĀ 17.10 at T II 586b6, 正業 also stands in the place of right thought and 正行 in the place of right action. right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration. This is reckoned the middle path for vision and understanding, for knowledge and understanding, for perpetual quietude and appeasement, for accomplishing penetrative knowledge and attaining full awakening, for accomplishing [real] recluseship and proceeding [towards] Nirvāṇa.

"[There are] four noble truths. What are reckoned to be the [four] noble truths? They are the noble truth of dukkha, the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, and the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha.

"What is the noble truth of dukkha? Birth is dukkha, old age is dukkha, disease is dukkha, death is dukkha, association with what is disliked is dukkha,[n.37] [41] Adopting a correction suggested in the CBETA edition of 僧 to 憎. dissociation from what is liked is dukkha, not to get what one wishes is dukkha, said in short, the five aggregates of clinging are dukkha. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of dukkha.

"Again, the noble truth of dukkha should be understood. I have already understood it. [For this], the eight[fold] right path of right view, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration should be cultivated.

"What is the noble truth of the arising of dukkha? It is being conditioned by craving, which is the origin for being born, together with sensual desire related to the experience of pleasure.[n.38] [42] Adopting the variant 受 instead of 愛. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the arising of dukkha.

"Again, this noble truth of the arising of dukkha should be eradicated. I have already realized its eradication. [For this], the eight[fold] right path of right view … up to … right concentration should be cultivated.

"What is called the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha? The perpetual cessation of that craving, its fading away, its eradication, its giving up, release from it, deliverance from it, its perpetual cessation, its appeasement, and detachment from it.[n.39] [43] My translation follows the indication in Hirakawa 1997: 669 that 樔窟 renders ālaya. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha.

"Again, this noble truth of the cessation of dukkha should be realized. I have already realized it. [For this], the eight[fold] right path of right view … up to … right concentration should be cultivated.

"What is the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha? It is this noble eight[fold] path of right view … up to … right concentration. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha.

"Again, this noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha should be cultivated. I have already cultivated this noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha.

"Knowledge arose, vision arose, awakening arose, understanding arose, insight arose, wisdom arose, and I attained realization that this is the noble truth of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which should be understood. Again, knowledge arose, vision arose, awakening arose, understanding arose, insight arose, and wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which I have already understood. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of dukkha.

"Knowledge arose, vision arose, awakening arose, understanding arose, insight arose, and wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which should be eradicated. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which I have already eradicated. This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the arising of dukkha.

"Knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which should be realized. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which I have already realized. [This is reckoned to be the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha.]

"Knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which should be cultivated. Again, knowledge arose … up to … wisdom arose that this is the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha, which is a teaching not heard before and which I have already cultivated. [This is the noble truth of the path leading out of dukkha.] These are reckoned to be the four noble truths.

"As long as I had not cultivated these four noble truths in three turnings and twelve modes, not understood them as they really are, I had not accomplished supreme and complete awakening. When I had understood these four noble truths in three turnings and twelve modes as they really are, I had accomplished supreme and complete awakening and I was without doubts and obstructions.

"When the Tathāgata proclaims these four noble truths and there is nobody among the assemblies who realizes them, then the Tathāgata has not turned the wheel of Dharma for them. When the Tathāgata proclaims these four noble truths and there is someone among the assemblies who realizes them, then the Tathāgata has turned the wheel of Dharma for them, which recluses and brahmins, Māra, the devas [of the retinue] of Māra, devas and men in the world are not able to turn.

"Therefore an effort should be made to cultivate the four noble truths, the noble truth of dukkha, the noble truth of the arising of dukkha, the noble truth of the cessation of dukkha, and the noble truth of the path that leads out of dukkha. You should train like this."

At the time when the Blessed One proclaimed this teaching to the five monks, Aññāta Koṇḍañña attained the arising of the eye of Dharma, eliminating [mental] stains and [mental] dust. Then the Blessed One, knowing what Aññāta Koṇḍañña had attained in his mind, in turn spoke these words: "Aññāta Koṇḍañña already knows, Aññāta Koṇḍañña already knows." From then onwards he was called Aññāta Koṇḍañña.

Then the spirits of the earth heard what the Tathāgata had said and in turn each proclaimed: "Just now the Tathāgata, the arahant, the perfectly awakened one, being at Vārāṇasī, at the Seers' [Dwelling Place], in the Deer Park, has turned the supreme wheel of Dharma that has not been turned before, which recluses and brahmins, Māra, the devas [of the retinue] of Māra, devas and men are not able to turn."

When the spirits of the earth made this proclamation, the Four Heavenly Kings heard it … the devas of the Thirty-three … the Yāma devas … the Tusita devas … the Nimmānaratī devas the Paranimmitavasavattī devas in turn each proclaimed: "Just now the Tathāgata, the arahant, the perfectly awakened one, being at Vārāṇasī, at the Seers' [Dwelling Place], in the Deer Park, has turned the supreme wheel of Dharma [that has not been turned before], which recluses and brahmins, Māra, the devas [of the retinue] of Māra, devas and men are not able to turn." At that time in an instant this proclamation was made in turn by each [of the various devas] and reached as far as the Brahmā devas.

---

Study (3)

The Dharmaguptaka Vinaya version highlights that the setting in motion of the wheel of Dharma takes place once "the Tathāgata proclaims these four noble truths and there is someone among the assemblies who realizes them." This in fact reflects the main point of the discourse, whose purpose in all versions is to show how the Buddha communicated his own realization of Nirvāṇa in such a way to his five former companions that one of them was able to attain stream-entry.[n.40] [44] According to the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, Pradhan 1967: 371,4 (6.54c), the wheel of Dharma refers to the path of vision, i.e., stream-entry; cf. also the Abhidharmakośavyākhyā, Wogihara 1936: 580,24.

Understood in this way, the motif of the wheel of Dharma expresses the conjunction of a core teaching of early Buddhism with its actual and successful practice.

The importance accorded by tradition to this motif is widely reflected in its popularity in Buddhist art.[n.41] [45] For a survey cf., e.g., Schlingloff 2000: 62f. Even seals used by Mūlasarvāstivāda monastics to represent the community should according to the Vinaya prescriptions carry the wheel image; cf. Schopen 1996/2004: 232. A well-known representation is a Gupta-period image from Sārnāth, which shows the seated Buddha with his hands in the gesture of setting in motion the wheel of Dharma.[n.42] Cf. below p. 652. The ornamented halo surrounding the Buddha is flanked by a deva on each side, one of whom appears to be raising the right hand to the ear as if listening. If this is indeed the case, then this could be a pictorial reference to hearing the celestial proclamation that the Buddha has set in motion the wheel of Dharma.

The Buddha is flanked by two winged lions. Although these probably just have an ornamental function as a support for the crossbars, given the present narrative context they bring up an association with the motif of the lion's roar, discussed above.[n.43] [46] Cf. above p. 31ff. Pandey 1978: 29f notes other examples where representations of the first sermon depict lions. Below the seated Buddha in the centre is the wheel of Dharma, with an antelope on each side, reflecting the location of the first sermon at the Migadāya.[n.44] [47] According to Schlingloff 2000: 63, the animals depicted in such representations are blackbuck antelopes (antilope cervicapra), kṛṣṇasāra. The wheel is surrounded by the first five disciples, who listen with respectfully raised hands.

Notably, besides the five monks a woman and a child or perhaps a dwarf are depicted. According to Huntington (1986: 40), "the female and the dwarf/child are probably donor figures present as patrons of the image." If the woman represented should indeed be the donor of the stele,[n.45] [48] On the tendency for donors to be represented in Indian art in the 9th to 12th centuries cf. Bautze-Picron 1995: 63. For other instances where depictions of the human audience of the first sermon vary from the count of five cf. Pandey 1978: 43. then this would be yet another pointer to the important role of female donors in ancient Indian art.[n.46] [49] Cf., e.g., Vogel 1929/1930: 13–15, Law 1940, Dutt 1962: 128–131, Willis 1985, Roy 1988, Schopen 1988/1997: 248–250, Dehejia 1992, Willis 1992, Singh 1996, Barnes 2000, Shah 2001, Skilling 2001b, Osto 2008: 110–113, Kim 2012, Mokashi 2012, and Rao 2012: 133–160.

Such a pictorial reference to a woman and a child or a dwarf is absent from another relief that depicts the same scene.[n.47] Cf. below p. 653. This version has the main elements of the first image, the seated Buddha with his hands in the gesture of setting in motion the wheel of Dharma, flanked by two celestial attendants, and below the Buddha the wheel of Dharma, with an antelope on each side and the first five disciples listening with respectfully raised hands.

The employing of a scheme of four truths when setting in motion the wheel of Dharma, depicted in these two reliefs, appears to be based on an analogy with Indian medical diagnosis. Although we do not have certain proof that ancient Indian medicine had such a scheme,[n.48] [50] Cf. Har Dayal 1932/1970: 159, Filliozat 1934: 301, and Wezler 1984: 312– 324. Already Oldenberg 1881/1961: 374 note 2 had expressed doubts as to whether the fourfold scheme was a case of borrowing by the Buddhists. this needs to be considered in light of the fact that extant āyurvedic treatises in general stem from a later period. Since the comparison of the four truths to medical diagnosis is explicitly made in several early Buddhist texts,[n.49] [51] For a more detailed discussion cf. Anālayo 2011g. it seems probable that some such diagnostic scheme was known and in use in daily life.[n.50] [52] Zysk 1995: 149 comments that "there is little doubt that the system of Buddhist monastic medicine and Hindu āyurveda derived from a common source. Contrary to the view accepted by most orthodox Hindus, the origin of this shared system of healing is to be found among the ancient communities of heterodox wandering ascetics, or śramaṇas"; cf. also Wujastyk 1995: 20f.

The significance of employing such a diagnostic scheme needs to be considered within the narrative setting of the present discourse. Needless to say, with the sources at our disposal it is not possible to reconstruct what actually happened. This does not mean, however, that the narrative cannot be studied with an eye to its internal coherence.

According to the narrative setting of the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta and its parallels, the recently awakened Buddha had set himself the task of conveying his realization of Nirvāṇa to his five former companions. These five would have seen asceticism as the path to deliverance and considered a deviation from ascetic practices as veering off into some form of sensual indulgence. In such a context, the teaching of a middle path that avoids these two extremes is an obvious starting point. It may well be, as suggested by some versions, that the five needed some time to ponder over this, to them, new approach to liberation.[n.51] [53] Cf. Anālayo 2012a: 35f. In this new approach, the appropriate attitude of right view (factor 1) informs one's intention (factor 2) conduct (factors 3 to 5), and meditative cultivation of the mind (factors 6 to 8), the whole becoming an eightfold path.

With the eightfold path disclosed,[n.52] [54] Given the narrative setting, it is only to be expected that the middle path comes first and that this path then later comes to be integrated in the full exposition of the four truths, pace Pande 1957: 227, who reasons that "the section on the Four Truths comes suddenly upon the preceding one, and in fact contains a second, more comprehensive, summary of the doctrine with the result that the eightfold path is needlessly repeated. This repetition shows that when §§ 4–5 were composed there was as yet no intention of speaking of the 'four truths', for, if that had been the case, the sermon would most probably have begun with them and let the path come in its proper place." Instead, as Dessein 2007: 21 points out, "as the eight constituent parts of the noble path can all be seen as characteristic for a 'middle mode of progress', while this is not the case for the three other truths, it is not unlikely that the fourth truth was the first to be proclaimed by the Buddha" (although Dessein then adopts the in my view unconvincing hypothesis that the four truths as a set would be a later modification). it would be natural for the Buddha to base his teaching on what would have been common ground among ancient Indian recluse traditions, namely the quest for a solution to the problem of dukkha.[n.53] [55] Cf., e.g., the Ṭhāṇaṅga 1.45, Jambūvijaya 1985: 9,2, according to which Mahāvīra's attainment of liberation implied that he had eradicated all dukkha. As Hamilton 1997: 279 points out, "in the religious milieu in which he lived in north India in the fifth century BCE the Buddha was not alone in such a quest." When attempting to explain his discovery to his audience, it would have been logical for the Buddha to explain first of all his understanding of dukkha (first truth).

The first truth presents the five aggregates of clinging as a summary of the fact of dukkha,[n.54] [56] Those of the Chinese versions (translated in my two studies) that explain the first noble truth do consider the five aggregates of clinging as a summary of the preceding instances of dukkha (although the relevant passage in T 1450 at T XXIV 128b5 is abbreviated, the corresponding passage in Gnoli 1977: 137,24 makes it clear that the same holds also for the Saṅghabhedavastu). These versions do not support the hypothesis by Vetter 1998, based on some variant readings in Pāli texts that add pi after the reference to the five aggregates of clinging, that the five aggregates of clinging are just considered to be an alternative instance of dukkha; cf. also Anālayo 2011c: 805 note 239. which would make it clear that a translation of this term as "suffering" fails to convey adequately the range of meaning of dukkha in this context.[n.55] [57] Gunaratna 1968/2008: 5f points out that "the popular rendering of dukkha as 'suffering' is not quite satisfactory since the word 'suffering' is likely to convey the idea of pain only … the word dukkha must awaken in our minds not only thoughts of pain and distress, but also all those thoughts about the unsatisfactory and illusory nature of the things of this world … [about] their failure to satisfy completely"; cf. also Anālayo 2003: 244f. The five aggregates of clinging are unsatisfactory, but they are not always suffering.[n.56] [58] SN 22.60 at SN III 69,16 and its parallel SĀ 81 at T II 21a3 (translated with references to further parallels in Anālayo 2013f) agree in indicating that each aggregate is not entirely painful, but also productive of happiness, which is why living beings become attached to them. Passages such as these make it plainly evident, I think, that dukkha as a term to characterize all conditioned experiences needs to be translated in a way that clearly marks a difference from its use in reference to what are painful feelings or experiences. The fact that none of the five aggregates is capable of yielding lasting satisfaction can be understood through introspection, confirming that they are indeed dukkha in this sense. The translation "suffering", however, turns the quality of dukkha from something to be understood into something to be believed, since introspection properly carried out will reveal that the five aggregates are not always suffering.

Much less are the five aggregates consistently "pain",[n.57] [59] The translation "pain" was used by Rhys Davids 1880/2000: 52 in his rendering of the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta, alternating with the translation "suffering". The arguments in favour of the translation "pain" by Harvey 2009: 213–216 seem to me unconvincing. which in my view is an even worse translation of dukkha. Such a rendering is easily confused with pain as one of the three feelings. The five aggregates of clinging are dukkha only in the sense of being "unsatisfactory"; even when they result in an experience of pleasure and joy, this will not be able to provide lasting satisfaction because sooner or later any pleasure or joy is bound to succumb to the law of impermanence and thereby becomes a case of not getting what one wishes, one of the aspects of dukkha in the first noble truth.[n.58] Pandita 2015: 347f does not seem to appreciate fully the implications of impermanence as an aspect of dukkha. The problem of impermanence is change against one's wish and beyond one's control. Thus impermanence is not just the type of change that raises the value of enjoyment by providing limitation (as per a quote he gives from Freud) and thus avoiding monotony, but much rather points to a fundamental predicament underlying the tendency to seek for pleasure in what is dukkha, in the sense of being incapable of providing lasting satisfaction, and anattā, in the sense of being outside of one's complete control.

Besides building on the commonly accepted fact of dukkha, the Buddha was about to teach to the five something "not heard before", according to a recurrent reference in the various versions. This conveys that he had discovered what was substantially different from contemporary religious doctrines and philosophies. Therefore, when communicating his discovery, he had to find new ways of expression that differed from the philosophies and doctrines proposed by his contemporaries. At the same time, however, his teaching had to rely to some degree on concepts and ideas already known in order to be understood. In other words, in teaching the middle way the Buddha himself had to follow a middle way in his use of concepts and expressions.

In such a situation the employment of a scheme presumably known to his audience as a form of medical diagnosis has its proper place. Independently of whether or not one accepts the traditional report that this teaching originated with the Buddha, the employment of such a scheme reflects a thoroughly pragmatic approach; it points directly to a psychological attitude towards dukkha and its solution.

In this way the use of a medical diagnosis scheme provides the appropriate frame for the essential teaching that the cause for the arising of dukkha is to be found within one's own mind, that one's own craving is responsible for dukkha (second truth).[n.59] [60] According to Batchelor 2012: 95, however, the implication of the second noble truth described in the first discourse is that "craving is what arises from dukkha, rather than the other way round." His suggestion is based on identifying the five aggregates mentioned in the first noble truth with links like consciousness and name-and-form, etc., which in the standard presentation of dependent arising, paṭicca samuppāda, lead to the arising of craving. His line of reasoning is based on considering only interim links in the standard formulation of paṭicca samuppāda, without taking into account the beginning and end points. According to the beginning point, the root cause for craving is ignorance. In the case of an arahant, then, consciousness and name-and-form, etc., are still dukkha, yet this does not lead to the arising of craving, precisely because of the absence of ignorance. According to the end point, craving leads via birth, old age, and disease (mentioned explicitly as instances of dukkha in the first noble truth) to "the arising of this whole mass of dukkha". There can be little doubt that the standard presentation of paṭicca samuppāda intends to show that ignorance leads via craving to dukkha, not that dukkha leads to craving. In support of his hypothesis, Batchelor 2012: 96 mentions Sn 862 to 874 as what he considers to be an "earlier version" of paṭicca samuppāda. Yet, Sn 862 to 874 does not explicitly mention either craving or dukkha as a general characteristic of existence (Sn 873 does use the term, but this reference is to a type of feeling mentioned alongside sukha, not to the general characteristic). Thus this discourse is of no direct relevance to the question of the relationship between craving and dukkha. A discourse that is of direct relevance to this question is SN 12.23 at SN II 31,34 (for a study and translation cf. Bodhi 1980), where paṭicca samuppāda is taken beyond the arising of dukkha in order to show what arises from dukkha. Instead of presenting dukkha as leading to the arising of craving, however, according to this discourse dukkha is the proximate cause for "faith" or "confidence", saddhā, which eventually leads to liberation; a presentation similarly found in its parallels MĀ 55 at T I 491a7: 習 苦便有信 and D 4094 ju 50a6 or Q 5595 tu 54b4: sdug bsngal gyi rgyu can gyi dad pa; cf. also the Abhidharmakośabhāṣya, Pradhan 1967: 39,2: duḥkhopaniṣac chraddhā. Thus the conclusion by Batchelor 2012: 100 that "the problem with craving is not that it causes suffering (although obviously sometimes it does) but that it prevents one from entering the eightfold path" (which then leads him to the idea that "the ceasing of craving gives rise to the eightfold path", p. 101) is contrary to the position taken in the early Buddhist canonical discourses. Not only the cause, but also the solution, the cessation of dukkha, can be found within one's own mind (third truth). This makes it clear that the final goal is not something that takes place only after death, but instead is something that can be realized here and now.

Such realization here and now then requires the middle-path approach delineated in the eightfold path (fourth truth). Expressed in medical terms, the core teaching could be represented in this way:

disease:	dukkha
pathogen:	craving
health:	Nirvāṇa
cure:	eightfold path

The suggestion that the scheme of the four truths was inspired by popular medical diagnosis certainly does not diminish the value of the actual insight into them.[n.60] [61] Halbfass 1991/1992: 245 reasons that "if the 'four noble truths' had, indeed, been borrowed from an earlier medical scheme, the intense sense of discovery, of a new and overwhelming insight, which the early Buddhists and apparently the Buddha himself attached to the 'four truths', would be hard to understand." What is actually realized is the attainment of Nirvāṇa, the cessation of dukkha, and it is only in order to express this realization in a form comprehensible to others that the scheme of the four truths has its place. With the attainment of Nirvāṇa, dukkha is fully understood (as one knows what completely transcends dukkha), craving is eradicated, the cessation of dukkha is realized, and the cultivation of the eightfold path reaches its consummation.[n.61] [62] Schmithausen 1981: 218 sees a contrast between "Liberating Insight as a comprehension of the four Noble Truths … [and] a fundamentally different view according to which Liberating Insight is considered to be … an anticipatory experience, or a comprehension based on such an experience, of Nirvāṇa". In reply, Stuart 2013: 25 argues that "the cessation model and the realization-of-the-truths model … may very well have originally been positive and negative sides of the same coin." (His argument concerns the cessation of perception and feeling, but the same would hold also for the cessation of dukkha experienced with the attainment of Nirvāṇa in general). Stuart 2013: 44 adds that in spite of the apparent difference between a "state of cessation and a … realization of the Four Noble Truths, the practice said to lead to these states may very well have originally been singular"; cf. also Anālayo 2017a.

In this way, the four noble truths as what according to tradition marks the beginning of the Buddha's teaching activities have the realization of Nirvāṇa as their foundation. Independent of whether one considers texts like the Dhammacakkappavattana-sutta and its parallels to be descriptive or prescriptive, a meditative "experience", by way of the realization of the cessation of dukkha through the attainment of Nirvāṇa, clearly assumes a central role for the foundational teachings in early Buddhist thought.[n.62] [63] Cf., e.g, Gómez 1987a: 355, who explains that the Buddha's awakening "represents the human experience around which the religion would develop its practices and ideals. This was the experience whereby Śākyamuni became an 'Awakened One' (buddha). His disciples came to believe that all aspects of Buddhist doctrine and practice flow from this experience of awakening (bodhi)." Yet, according to Sharf 1995a: 246 and 259 "the Buddhist emphasis on 'inner experience' is in large part a product of modern and often lay-oriented reform movements", being "a product of twentieth-century reforms inspired in part by Occidental models." Here he uses the term 'experience' in a Western philosophical sense as something that entails phenomenal properties. Now the observation by Sharf 2000: 271 that this notion of "religious experience is a relatively late and distinctly Western invention" does not mean that religious experiences were not a central feature of early Buddhism before Western scholars began to describe them. In fact, it seems to me that an appreciation of the role of 'experience' in early Buddhist thought needs to approach the matter from the viewpoint of the concepts and ideas that are used within the Buddhist tradition, instead of imposing modern Western concepts. Here a central term would be āyatana, which stands for experience through any of the six senses (the five bodily senses and the mind considered as a sixth sense), for the meditative experience of the immaterial spheres during deep concentration, and for the experience of Nirvāṇa. As regards the last, SN 35.117 at SN IV 98,3 speaks of a "sphere of experience that should be known", āyatane veditabbe, namely – and I wonder if this can be appreciated based on Western concepts of "experience" – precisely the cessation of the six senses and their corresponding perceptions. According to the commentary Spk II 391,3, this description refers to Nirvāṇa. The parallel SĀ 211 at T II 53b12 similarly reads 入處當覺知, where 入處 corresponds to āyatana, and 當覺知 to "should be realized". Ud 8.1 at Ud 80,9, in a discourse explicitly introduced as being related to the topic of Nirvāṇa, emphatically asserts that "there is that sphere of experience", atthi … tad āyatanaṃ. This is then followed by describing that therein the four elements representative of ordinary experience as well as the notions informing the immaterial spheres are absent; cf. also Uv 26.24f, Bernhard 1965: 329, and T 213 at T IV 791a9. Therefore I would contend that modern-day "vipassanā" traditions, with all their idiosyncrasies, can nevertheless be seen to stand in a continuum with early Buddhist thought in their quest for Nirvāṇa as a "sphere of experience that should be known"; cf. also Dhammadinnā 2014: 105f note 92 and for a critical reply to Sharf from the viewpoint of the Tibetan tradition Gyatso 1999. Sarbacker 2005: 41 points out that meditative experiences "are significant aspects of the religious lives of these practitioners and are not simply verbal constructions that can be explained away through recourse to notions of 'interpretation' and 'rhetoric'." Therefore (ibid. p. 49), "to argue that meditative methodologies are not meant to be put into practice or that they are simply textualized and ritualized is to draw significantly unwarranted conclusions."

In order to convey that this realization takes place as the culmination of a path of practice, the threefold turning has its place. Here the parallel versions employ different ways of presenting these three turnings. They either apply the three turnings to one truth after the other, or else they relate each turning to all four truths. Presented schematically, the basic grid looks as in table 2 (through which some versions work row by row, while others go through it column by column).[n.63] [64] I am indebted to Rod Bucknell (email dated 27 April 2012) for drawing my attention to this pattern.

The Sarvāstivāda and Mūlasarvāstivāda versions list all four truths and only then take up the three turnings. The Dharmaguptaka, Mahīśāsaka, and Theravāda versions present the first truth in terms of the three turnings and then turn to the next truth, etc.

Table 2: The Three Turnings

dukkha:	its arising:	its cessation:	the path:
should be understood	should be eradicated	should be realized	should be cultivated
has been understood	has been eradicated	has been realized	has been cultivated

The second Ekottarika-āgama discourse, however, just refers to the three turnings and the resulting twelve modes, without working through them in detail, so that it falls into neither of the two groups. Perhaps the second Ekottarika-āgama discourse here preserves an earlier presentation, when the three turnings and twelve modes were just mentioned, without being worked out in full,[n.64] [65] Feer 1870: 431 comments that "tous les textes sont d'accord pour nous représenter l'évolution duodécimale comme partie intégrante, comme partie essentielle de la première prédication du Buddha", yet "je ne puis voir là une des formes primitives de l'enseignement." Schmithausen 1981: 203 suggests that "it is not likely that this rather sophisticated and schematic account of the Enlightenment of the Buddha is the original one." similar in type to the brief reference to the five aggregates or the bare listing of the factors of the eightfold path in the previous part of the discourse. This need not imply that the idea of three turnings as such is late, but only that a full exposition of this idea may not have been part of the discourse from the outset.[n.65] [66] Such a full exposition would be a natural occurrence in orally transmitted texts and need not be motivated by any particular agenda, pace Bronkhorst 1993/2000: 106, who comments that it is "likely that these … are later additions to the text", which he then considers to be "evidence that the Buddhists themselves did not feel comfortable about recognizing the Four Noble Truths as liberating insight" and therefore (if I understand him correctly) felt a need to elaborate on them.

Even though the full exposition given in most versions might be late, the fact that it is a formalized mode of presentation in itself is not necessarily a sign of lateness. Ong (1982/1996: 34f) explains that [in an] oral culture, to solve effectively the problem of retaining and retrieving carefully articulated thought, you have to do your thinking in mnemonic patterns, shaped for ready oral recurrence … in an oral culture, to think through something in non-formulaic, non-patterned, non-mnemonic terms … would be a waste of time, for such thought, once worked through, could never be recovered with any effectiveness.

Thus formulaic presentations of the above type need not invariably be a sign of lateness, but could be a reflection of the oral setting in which these presentations came into existence.[n.66] [67] Bareau 1963: 180, however, holds that "l'examen des Vérités selon les trois cycles et les douze aspects, par sa sécheresse et sa logique, sent déjà nettement l'Abhidharma."

The reference to the three turnings makes it clear that the scheme of four truths serves as a shorthand for what is, in actual practice, a more or less prolonged development. This begins with the recognition that something needs to be done about these four truths. The fact of dukkha needs to be fully understood, craving needs to be eradicated, the cessation of dukkha needs to be realized, and the eightfold path needs to be cultivated. This development continues until it eventually finds its culmination when dukkha has indeed been fully understood, craving has indeed been eradicated, the cessation of dukkha has indeed been realized, and the eightfold path has been successfully cultivated to its consummation point. Having completed this trajectory himself, and having enabled others to follow the same trajectory, the Buddha had, according to the traditional account, set in motion the wheel of Dharma.